Hiltzik: Here are all the ways that Trump has tried to kill U.S. science research
Trump's war on federal science funding has already erased billions in research grants, with partisan vetting and DEI hunts replacing evidence-based inquiry.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has translated into a methodical dismantling of American scientific research. Federal agencies have canceled or frozen thousands of grants, redirecting billions of dollars away from laboratories and into political score-settling.
The filters are explicit: any project that can be tied to diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, or that fails a partisan political test, is marked for termination. What began as campaign rhetoric has become bureaucratic reality, with career scientists watching their funding evaporate under new ideological oversight.
Billions of dollars in already-approved research have been clawed back. The targets range from climate studies and public-health modeling to basic biomedical inquiries that once enjoyed broad bipartisan support. Review panels now scan proposals for forbidden phrases and suspect institutional affiliations rather than scientific merit.
The pattern is not subtle. Grants touching racial equity, gender studies, or environmental justice have been terminated en masse. Even projects only tangentially related to these themes have been swept up if reviewers detect the wrong vocabulary or institutional sponsor. The result is a chilling effect that reaches far beyond the canceled awards themselves.
University researchers report that labs are shrinking staff, postponing experiments, and turning down graduate students because the funding pipeline has suddenly gone dry. The damage is not theoretical; it is measured in halted clinical trials, abandoned longitudinal studies, and the quiet decision by young scientists to leave the field entirely.
What remains unclear is how long this purge can continue before the United States cedes its long-held edge in discovery and innovation to nations unburdened by such self-inflicted ideological tests. The next budget cycle will reveal whether Congress tolerates the precedent or finally draws a line.
Original reporting: LA Times.
Original reporting: LA Times, Business.
More in Business
- IMF Chief Warns of Economic Divergence and Debt Risks Amid Artificial Intelligence Boom
Kristalina Georgieva suggests that while AI could significantly boost global growth, it simultaneously threatens to widen inequality and exacerbate inflationary pressures and public debt burdens.
- California Limits Utility Profits and Expands Home Energy Role
Gov. Gavin Newsom signed laws capping utility returns on lower-risk projects and accelerating virtual power plant development.
- Lyft to Pay $272.5 Million in Record California Wage-Theft Settlement
Largest such settlement in state history resolves claims that Lyft misclassified drivers as independent contractors from 2016 to 2020, denying them core wage protections.