Cooperation and Coercion as Pathways to Social Power in Adolescents
A study of Ontario high school students reveals that adolescents can gain social power through both cooperation and coercion, with different strategies linked to distinct forms of influence.


A study of Ontario high school students found that adolescents can gain social power through coercion, but also through cooperation, admired traits, friendships, and alliances, according to research published in Evolutionary Psychological Science (1). Social power becomes especially important during adolescence, when peer status, dating opportunities, access to resources, protection from victimization, and influence within the group can all carry real social value. But power is not one dimensional. Some adolescents might gain it through dominance, intimidation, or coercion, while others may gain it through prestige, cooperation, admired qualities, or supportive relationships. [1]
The researchers measured three “power-enhancing processes,” including coercive strategies, cooperative strategies, and peer-valued characteristics (1). Coercion was measured with an item asking who forces, threatens, or tricks others to get their way. Cooperation was measured with three items about helping, cooperating, leading fairly, and being kind. Peer-valued characteristics were measured with six items assessing traits such as being good looking, good at sports, academically successful, funny, having cool possessions, and being tough in a fight. [1]
The researchers found that different strategies were linked to different forms of adolescent power. Coercive strategies were strongly associated with dominance, meaning adolescents who were seen as threatening, forcing, or tricking others were also more likely to be viewed as getting their way and influencing others (1). This supports the idea that coercion can be one pathway to dominance. Coercion was also moderately associated with alliances and weakly associated with prestige, suggesting that coercive adolescents may sometimes gain support from others, perhaps because they are seen as powerful, useful allies, or risky to oppose. [1]
Cooperation was also an important pathway to power. Adolescents who were seen as kind, helpful, cooperative, and fair leaders received more friendship and alliance nominations, and they were also more likely to be viewed as prestigious (1). Peer-valued characteristics were linked to both prestige and dominance, suggesting that admired traits can support multiple kinds of social influence. [1]
Advertisement
The study, conducted by Tristan Chaderton Bowman and colleagues, involved 458 adolescents aged 14 to 18 from a high school in southern Ontario (1). Students completed surveys on electronic tablets, and their responses were analyzed to understand how different strategies affect social power. The researchers measured three 'power-enhancing processes,' including coercive strategies, cooperative strategies, and peer-valued characteristics (1). [1]
Coercion was measured using items that asked students to identify peers who force, threaten, or trick others to get their way (1). Cooperation was assessed through three items about helping, cooperating, leading fairly, and being kind (1). Peer-valued characteristics were measured with six items, including being good-looking, good at sports, academically successful, funny, having cool possessions, and being tough in a fight (1). [1]
The researchers found that coercive strategies were strongly associated with dominance, meaning adolescents who were seen as threatening or coercive were more likely to be viewed as getting their way and influencing others (1). Coercion was also moderately associated with alliances and weakly associated with prestige (1). Cooperation was found to be an important pathway to power, with adolescents who were seen as kind, helpful, or fair leaders receiving more friendship and alliance nominations (1). [1]
The study, conducted by Tristan Chaderton Bowman and colleagues, involved 458 adolescents aged 14 to 18 from a high school in southern Ontario (1). Coercion was measured using items that asked students to identify peers who force, threaten, or trick others to get their way (1). The researchers found that coercive strategies were strongly associated with dominance, meaning adolescents who were seen as threatening or coercive were more likely to be viewed as getting their way and influencing others (1). [1]
Advertisement
Cooperation was also an important pathway to power. Adolescents who were seen as kind, helpful, cooperative, and fair leaders received more friendship and alliance nominations, and they were also more likely to be viewed as prestigious (1). This suggests that cooperation can lead to social power through admiration and respect from peers rather than through intimidation or coercion (1). [1]
Peer-valued characteristics were linked to both prestige and dominance, suggesting that admired traits can support multiple kinds of social influence (1). Cooperation was especially strongly related to friendship nominations when adolescents also had more peer-valued characteristics (1). This highlights the complex interplay between different strategies in the development of social power among adolescents (1). [1]
A study of Ontario high school students found that adolescents can gain social power through cooperation, admired traits, friendships, and alliances, according to research published in Evolutionary Psychological Science (1). The researchers measured three 'power-enhancing processes,' including coercive strategies, cooperative strategies, and peer-valued characteristics (1). The study involved 458 adolescents aged 14 to 18 from a high school in southern Ontario (1). [1]
Cooperation was measured with three items about helping, cooperating, leading fairly, and being kind (1). The researchers found that different strategies were linked to different forms of adolescent power. Cooperation was also an important pathway to power. Peer-valued characteristics were linked to both prestige and dominance, suggesting that admired traits can support multiple kinds of social influence (1). [1]
Advertisement
The researchers found that cooperation was especially strongly related to friendship nominations when adolescents also had more peer-valued characteristics (1). Cooperation was also more strongly related to alliances when coercion was low, suggesting that cooperative and coercive strategies did not combine into a stronger 'best of both worlds' route to alliance-building (1). [1]
Sources
Prepared with AI assistance from the cited sources.
The Cali Reporter newsletter
The stories worth your time.
California, the country, and what comes next. Join our free newsletter for reporting that keeps you informed.
More in Relationships
- Family Relationships May Influence Well-Being of Poor Taiwanese Adolescents
A study of Taiwanese adolescents in poverty suggests that family relationships may play a key role in explaining the link between material deprivation and psychological distress, as well as substance use.
- Aggressive Personality Traits and Jealousy in Romantic Relationships
A new study explores how aggressive personality traits and specific love styles contribute to jealousy in romantic relationships.
- Early Brain Differences in Dyslexia Linked to Visual Processing Before Formal Reading
A longitudinal study published in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience reveals that children who later develop dyslexia already show distinct neural responses to written words in kindergarten, before formal reading…