1 in 100 Mutations: Why Carriers of Intellectual Disability Genes Are Evolving Out of Existence
Carriers of recessive genes for intellectual disability are having fewer kids and leaving school earlier than the rest of us.


We often think of our relationship with our biology as something settled. We accept our parents, our grandparents, the family tree we were handed at birth. But sometimes you look at the data and realize your family history is not the only story on the page. There is a quiet, evolutionary story playing out right now involving a surprising number of people who carry the invisible load of recessive genes for intellectual disability. Recent research from Radboudumc has uncovered that these carriers are statistically less healthy and have a reduced chance of having offspring. It is a shift happening at the level of the gene, but it feels deeply personal.
For a long time, textbooks taught us about inheritance in very clear lines. You get a gene from your dad and one from your mom. If one causes a problem, it is dominant. If it is recessive, you only see the problem if you get the bad gene from both sides. However, researchers led by the Department of Human Genetics at Radboudumc published a remarkable finding in a 2014 issue of Nature that challenged that simple view. They discovered that inherited variants in genes were rarely the cause of intellectual disability. Instead, the vast majority of cases came from a spontaneous mutation. This is a genetic surprise that happens during conception. It is a mutation that neither parent has, but suddenly appears in the child. It is a biological fact that about one hundred of these spontaneous mutations occur in the hereditary material of each child. Most of them do nothing. On average only one affects a gene. And of those, only a fraction affects the hundreds of genes known to cause intellectual disability. Despite the rarity, this is how most intellectual disabilities arise in the world today.
This discovery led researchers, including Christian Gilissen who is a professor of Genome Bioinformatics, to ask another question. If most disabilities come from these new, spontaneous mutations, what happens to the recessive genes we inherit from our parents? There are more recessive genes for intellectual disability than dominant ones. So, you might expect to see a lot of children with recessive disabilities. But the clinic data did not show that. The researchers found very few children with double mutations in recessive genes. They looked at the population data from the UK Biobank, which included more than 300,000 people. They found that each person carries on average two mutations in any one of 1,900 recessive genes. According to the old textbooks, carriers of such recessive genes should not experience any disadvantage. They should be perfectly healthy. But the data told a different story. As a group, they do have more medical diagnoses and a slightly lower chance of having offspring. In essence, they are less likely to pass on their genes for these recessive disorders.
The most striking finding relates to genes for intellectual disability specifically. Unlike other recessive genes where carriers might just have a few extra health issues, these specific carriers stand out. They go to school for a shorter time. This suggests they have a lower level of education. Mind you, these are carriers. According to existing theory, they are not affected at all by their recessive gene. They should be indistinguishable from anyone else. Yet, the data shows a difference. The UK Biobank provides a clue to this mystery. It turns out that these carriers have reduced reproductive success and a shorter school career. This is not just about biology. It is about how the human experience shapes the flow of genes.
When we look at the history of science, we see that our understanding of evolution is always evolving. Han Brunner, a professor of clinical genetics, pointed out a connection to a different era of thinking. In 1859, Darwin published On the Origin of Species. That work focused mainly on survival and genes that make you strong and healthy. But twelve years later, Darwin wrote The Descent of Man. In that book, he refined his theory to include sexual selection. You can have fine genes, but if no one wants to have children with you, those genes will not be passed on. The researchers are not able to demonstrate this principle rock solidly, but if they had to offer a cause for their findings, sexual selection is the most obvious explanation. It is the subtle push of who chooses who that can drive evolutionary change.
This research clearly shows that carriers of recessive diseases face a selection disadvantage at the group level. In the past, experts have pointed this out for specific disorders. Here, for the first time, it has been demonstrated for recessive disorders in general. This is a significant shift in our understanding of how genetics and society interact. It might go into the textbooks eventually. Brunner noted that our research indicates that our genes are still constantly changing. The genetic landscape remains in motion, and evolution continues. The idea that in our modern age evolution has come to a creaking halt thanks to health care and other amenities is simply not true. It will never be, suggested Gilissen. He offered a final thought on our fate. We will never be optimized for tomorrow's problem.
First reported by ScienceDaily: Relationships.
More in Love & Relationships
- Clear requests and respectful boundaries belong in everyday relationships
NIH guidance highlights honest conversation, listening and limits as parts of supportive connections.
- How Eye-Tracking Revealed Hidden Social Skills in Severely Disabled Youth
A new study finds that personalized training can unlock social abilities in people often considered untestable.
- Sleep matters: Duration, timing, quality and more may affect cardiovascular disease risk
Healthy sleep includes multiple components, such as number of hours of sleep per night, how long it takes to fall asleep, daytime functionin


